中美贸易冲突报道中的批评话语分析 ——以“轮胎特保案”为例

中美贸易冲突报道中的批评话语分析 ——以“轮胎特保案”为例

论文摘要

“轮胎特保案”是奥巴马时代美国首起对华特保案,也是针对中国的最大特保案。本文选取《中国日报》和《纽约时报》上关于轮胎特保案的四篇经济新闻报道从批评话语分析角度进行了分析。批评话语分析是一种以韩礼德的系统功能语言学为主要理论依据的社会指向的语篇分析方法,通过对语篇的分析来揭示语言中意识形态及其与社会结构和权力统治的关系。本文首先介绍了批评话语分析的发展、原则,话语、权利和意识形态的关系以及批评话语分析在新闻报道中的应用和批评话语分析在国内的研究。进而,作者运用费尔克拉夫的三维话语分析模式和韩礼德的元语言功能理论相结合的批评话语分析框架对所选语料进行分析。在文本层面,文章对新闻报道语言的及物性特征进行分析,主要分析了及物性特征下的物质过程、言语过程和关系过程;在话语实践层面,通过对转述引语的转述方式和消息来源的分析研究新闻话语的互文性;在社会实践层面,从社会文化角度为语篇中文本层面和话语层面反映的意识形态寻求解释。研究发现:《中国日报》和《纽约时报》对“轮胎特保案”的报道基本上都是客观公正的,但是两份报纸对所在国的偏向也是显而易见的。新闻报道这一媒介要承担一定的宣传角色,为政治和国家利益服务。中美两国权力不平衡、两国的文化和历史,这些因素也影响了中美两国新闻媒体对涉及两国利益事件的报道。本文可以在一定程度上帮助读者提高批评意识,用批评的眼光来看待新闻报道,领会新闻话语背后体现的意识形态意义和权力关系。

论文目录

  • 摘要
  • Abstract
  • 1 Introduction
  • 1.1 Research background
  • 1.2 The significance of the research
  • 1.3 The structure of the thesis
  • 2 Literature Review
  • 2.1 Critical discourse analysis
  • 2.1.1 The development of CDA
  • 2.1.2 The principles of CDA
  • 2.2 Power, discourse and ideology
  • 2.3 The application in news discourse of CDA
  • 2.4 CDA at home
  • 2.5 Summary
  • 3 Methodology
  • 3.1 Fairclough’s three-dimensional framework
  • 3.2 Halliday’s Systemic-functional Grammar
  • 3.2.1 Experiential function
  • 3.2.2 Interpersonal function
  • 3.2.3 Textual function
  • 3.3 Summary
  • 4 Data Analysis
  • 4.1 Data collection
  • 4.2 Descriptions of the news reports in China Daily and The New York Times
  • 4.2.1 Material process
  • 4.2.2 Verbal process
  • 4.2.3 Relational process
  • 4.3 Interpretations
  • 4.3.1 Analysis of sources of news
  • 4.3.2 Analysis of modes
  • 4.4 Explanations
  • 4.4.1 Situational context
  • 4.4.2 Social context
  • 5 Conclusion
  • 5.1 Findings
  • 5.2 Limitations
  • Bibliography
  • Appendix A
  • Appendix B
  • Appendix C
  • Appendix D
  • Academic Achievements
  • Acknowledgement
  • 相关论文文献

    • [1].The Logic of Change of the CPC's Human Rights Discourse Since the Founding of the People's Republic of China[J]. The Journal of Human Rights 2020(01)
    • [2].Teaching speaking from a discourse perspective[J]. 长江丛刊 2016(35)
    • [3].The application of discourse analysis theory in English reading teaching[J]. 山西青年 2017(01)
    • [4].A Review of the Ecocritical Reading of Water Imagery in Postcolonial Novels[J]. 校园英语 2017(24)
    • [5].Context and its Role in Explaining Discourse Coherence[J]. 校园英语 2017(27)
    • [6].Negotiation of Role Relations in E-discourse:A Case Study of an Online Travel Forum[J]. Annual Review of Functional Linguistics 2010(00)
    • [7].Three Aspects as Considered of Discourse Analysis:World,Language and Participants[J]. 校园英语 2014(27)
    • [8].Eco-discourse Analysis within the Framework of Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. 海外英语 2020(16)
    • [9].The Translingual Practice of Human Rights: Value Tyranny and Overlapping Consensus of Cultures[J]. Human Rights 2014(06)
    • [10].A Study on College English Teachers'Use of discourse Markers[J]. 读与写(教育教学刊) 2009(11)
    • [11].Gender Discourse[J]. 校园英语 2016(15)
    • [12].Argumentation Analysis——A discourse Approach[J]. 现代企业教育 2012(09)
    • [13].Innovation of Chinese Discourse in the Context of Reform and Opening Up[J]. Contemporary Social Sciences 2020(03)
    • [14].Aspects of Transitivity in Select Social Transformation Discourse in Nigeria[J]. Language and Semiotic Studies 2020(02)
    • [15].Research on Discourse Markers from the Perspective of Relevance Theory[J]. 海外英语 2019(15)
    • [16].The Literature Review of Domestic Researches on Critical Discourse Analysis in Recent Ten Years[J]. 校园英语 2020(17)
    • [17].An Abnormal Created by Power Discourse— A Foucauldian Interpretation of Maurice[J]. 读与写(教育教学刊) 2014(04)
    • [18].Similarities in Early Chinese and Western Translation Discourse[J]. 校园英语 2018(03)
    • [19].Logical inferences in discourse analysis[J]. 科技视界 2014(26)
    • [20].The Subtitle Translation of Movie from the Perspective of Multimodal Discourse Analysis[J]. 海外英语 2020(11)
    • [21].A Summary of the Seminar on “Construction of China's Human Rights Discourse System in the New Era”[J]. The Journal of Human Rights 2018(03)
    • [22].Discourse, Power, Ideology in Advertisement Video[J]. 校园英语 2019(40)
    • [23].英汉互译实践与分析(四)[J]. 译苑新谭 2019(02)
    • [24].What,according to Michel Foucault,characterizes the order of discourse?[J]. 读与写(教育教学刊) 2011(08)
    • [25].再议术语翻译的规范性问题——以“discourse”译名为例[J]. 外语研究 2013(03)
    • [26].Development and Evaluation of Two Discourse-Based ELT Tasks in Business English Class[J]. 海外英语 2011(12)
    • [27].Identification by Antithesis and Oppositional Discourse Reproduction in Chinese Space of New Media[J]. Language and Semiotic Studies 2017(04)
    • [28].Research on Discourse Analysis of the News[J]. 海外英语 2011(08)
    • [29].“Discourse”的含义及其汉译[J]. 燕山大学学报(哲学社会科学版) 2010(01)
    • [30].Cursory Analysis of the Influence of Cognition to Discourse[J]. 科技信息 2010(23)

    标签:;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

    中美贸易冲突报道中的批评话语分析 ——以“轮胎特保案”为例
    下载Doc文档

    猜你喜欢