我们的选择,我们的话语:采用与大二学生协商的方式,激发学生参与口语活动

我们的选择,我们的话语:采用与大二学生协商的方式,激发学生参与口语活动

论文摘要

本论文立足于在语言教学中推行人性化教学,鼓励学生自主学习。通过让学生自主决定在口语活动中说什么话题,如何开展活动以及如何评价自身的口语活动,学生与教师形成一种课程协商的课堂模式。教师在口语活动场所中不再过多地承担组织和决策工作,但也并非完全放弃其职责,而是起到观察、引导的辅助性作用。本文记述了二年级大专生一个学期的口语活动。观察围绕以下几个方面展开:实施协商式课堂决策的前奏工作;师生协商教师角色、口语活动题材、活动形式和对活动的评价方式;协商过程所遇到的困难、其成因和解决方式。调查对象来自广东梅州市嘉应学院外语系36名英语教育专业大专二年级学生。作者通过问卷调查、课堂观察和访谈的形式,采用定性研究的方法,试图了解让学生参与课程设计和组织,以及让学生自主评价自己的活动过程这一人性化教学模式能否激励学生自觉主动地参与口语活动。调查结果表明:学生总体上喜欢这种协商式的口语活动,并且希望这一模式能继续下去。虽然学生们在口语活动中遇到了一定的困难,如口语题材的难易度的把握,对活动形式的改进,如何保证评分的客观性等,但这些困难在师生共同协商中得到了不同程度的解决。协商在师生之间形成了一种互相信任,互相尊重的氛围,使学生感觉到了学习的责任感。因为协商使学生在学习任务上有了决定权,所以在一定程度上缓解了学生们在口语活动时的焦虑和不安。学生们更愿意在自己设计、自己组织、自己评价的口语活动中练习口语,从而加强了他们练习口语的主动性。但是协商式教学并非一剂解决所有问题的万应良药,它还是没能让个别学生积极参与口语活动,作者也对其原因进行了简单的探讨。

论文目录

  • ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
  • ABSTRACT
  • 摘要
  • CONTENTS
  • CHAPTER ONE Introduction
  • 1.1 Background
  • 1.2 Research Question
  • CHAPTER TWO Theoretical Framework
  • 2.1 Humanistic Teaching
  • 2.2 Implementation of Humanistic Teaching in ELT
  • 2.3 Catalyst for Motivation
  • 2.3.1 My Motives for Classroom Negotiation
  • CHAPTER THREE Research Design
  • 3.1 Reasons for Negotiation
  • 3.2 Subjects and Course
  • 3.2.1 Students-teacher
  • 3.2.2 Oral Work in CR
  • 3.3 Preparing Learners for Negotiation
  • 3.3.1 Establishing a Friendly and Supportive Climate
  • 3.3.2 Changing the Former Deep-rooted Expectation of Appropriate Roles of Teachers and Learners
  • 3.3.3 Initial Questionnaire
  • 3.3.4 Data Presentation
  • CHAPTER FOUR Negotiation in Oral Work
  • 4.1 Introduction
  • 4.2 Group Norms and Grouping
  • 4.2.1 Group Norms
  • 4.2.2 Grouping
  • 4.3 Negotiation in Teacher's Role
  • 4.4 Negotiation in Topicalization
  • 4.4.1 Difficulty: Quality of the Topics
  • 4.5 Negotiation in Activity Design
  • 4.5.1 Difficulty: Cooperation among Group Members
  • 4.6 Negotiation in Assessment
  • 4.6.1 Difficulty: Mistrust and Unreliability of Peer Evaluation
  • CHAPTER FIVE Conclusion
  • 5.1 Difficulties
  • 5.1.1 Reliance on Chinese
  • 5.1.2 Exposure to Imperfect Language Models and Incorrect Feedback
  • 5.1.3 Inertia
  • 5.2 Advantages
  • 5.3 Teacher's Reflection
  • 5.3.1 Practice What You Preach
  • 5.3.2 Learner-centered Teaching
  • 5.3.3 Cooperative Learning
  • 5.4 Students' Reflection
  • 5.5 Limitations
  • REFERENCES
  • APPENDIX A TOPIC LIST(PLANNED IN ADVANCED)
  • APPENDIX B TOPICS IN USE
  • APPENDIX C ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
  • APPENDIX D STUDENTS' COMMENTS
  • APPENDIX E AN EXAMPLE OF STUDENTS' ACTIVITY
  • APPENDIX F ON ORALACTIVITY IN CLASSROOM
  • APPENDIX G EXAMPLES OF GROUP REPORTS
  • 相关论文文献

    • [1].Self-adaptive combination method for temporal evidence based on negotiation strategy[J]. Science China(Information Sciences) 2020(11)
    • [2].Construction of Business English Negotiation Practice Teaching Mode Based on PBGS Project Method[J]. 校园英语 2020(24)
    • [3].Intercultural Business Negotiation——From the social constructivist perspective[J]. 校园英语 2017(13)
    • [4].Techniques and Strategies of Language Use In Global Business Negotiation[J]. 校园英语(教研版) 2012(10)
    • [5].Factors of Success in International Business Negotiations[J]. 海外英语 2010(01)
    • [6].Conversational implicature in business negotiation[J]. 科技信息 2008(28)
    • [7].Essence and resolution of international climate negotiation[J]. Advances in Climate Change Research 2014(03)
    • [8].A Brief Analysis of Cultural Differences between China and America in Business Negotiation[J]. 校园英语 2016(19)
    • [9].Time Pressure Influence in Negotiation[J]. 海外英语 2012(04)
    • [10].A Discussion on the Relational Process of Business Negotiation[J]. 海外英语 2013(13)
    • [11].Chinese Business negotiation Styles[J]. ChinAfrica 2018(06)
    • [12].A PRIORITY-BASED NEGOTIATIONS APPROACH FOR HANDLING INCONSISTENCIES IN MULTI-PERSPECTIVE SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS[J]. Journal of Systems Science and Complexity 2008(04)
    • [13].Transitivity Study——Material Process in Business Negotiation[J]. 时代教育 2013(15)
    • [14].On Cultural Differences in Business Negotiation[J]. 英语广场(学术研究) 2011(Z6)
    • [15].Cultural Differences in International Business Negotiation[J]. 科技信息 2009(19)
    • [16].A Logic-Program-Based Negotiation Mechanism[J]. Journal of Computer Science & Technology 2009(04)
    • [17].Warming up for Negotiations[J]. China's Foreign Trade 2012(05)
    • [18].Cultural Differences in International Business Negotiation[J]. 海外英语 2011(05)
    • [19].Decision-making approach by employing grey incidence analysis and group negotiation[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics 2019(04)
    • [20].Cultural Barriers to International Business Negotiations[J]. 海外英语 2013(13)
    • [21].History-based trust negotiation model[J]. Journal of Shanghai University(English Edition) 2009(02)
    • [22].Chinese Business Negotiation Styles[J]. ChinAfrica 2018(07)
    • [23].“Economic Globalization:An Irreversible Process”——Interview of Yu Xiaosong,Former CCPIT President[J]. China's Foreign Trade 2011(09)
    • [24].Study on Skills and Strategies of Business Negotiation[J]. 校园英语 2017(36)
    • [25].The Basic Knowledge on International Cultural Information In Negotiation[J]. 校园英语 2017(50)
    • [26].Preparations before Business English Negotiation[J]. 留学生 2016(09)
    • [27].Impacts of Cultural Differences on International Business Negotiations[J]. 校园英语(教研版) 2011(08)
    • [28].Intelligent negotiation model for ubiquitous group decision scenarios[J]. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering 2016(04)
    • [29].A Study of Metadiscourse in Business English Negotiation[J]. 海外英语 2014(14)
    • [30].A policy-based automated negotiation for privileges in grid environments[J]. Academic Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University 2009(01)

    标签:;  ;  ;  ;  

    我们的选择,我们的话语:采用与大二学生协商的方式,激发学生参与口语活动
    下载Doc文档

    猜你喜欢